Narrative Demo

When 100 SQL scripts become a business bottleneck

A retail platform wants to move from SQL Server to MySQL without breaking revenue logic, ETL pipelines, or analyst trust. The challenge is not translation. The challenge is proof.

100

Scripts in scope

53%

Runtime concentrated in top 10 scripts

22%

Scripts flagged for manual review

78%

Converted in a single pass

Act 1: Workload Reality

The scripts move like sand until you ask the right question

Each particle is one MSSQL script. Watch the same workload re-organize by purpose, table family, risk, and execution pressure.

Input Dataset

Non-obvious challenges

    Act 2: Why This Matters

    Performance debt becomes migration risk

    What goes wrong in manual-only migration

    Teams hand-translate syntax quickly, then spend weeks chasing hidden semantics: lock hints, transaction behavior, null handling in joins, and collation differences. Costs rise in the review cycle, not the first draft.

    Why business leaders care

    In this dataset, a small set of scripts carries most runtime load. If those scripts regress, checkout latency, ETL freshness, and finance reporting all absorb the hit.

    The migration thesis

    LLMs are strongest when paired with routing rules and verification loops: accelerate the easy 80%, isolate the dangerous 20%, and produce an audit trail everyone can inspect.

    Act 3: The Six-Step LLM Pipeline

    Click a step to inspect the mechanism

    Act 4: Script-Level Proof

    Three real conversions, with the hidden decisions exposed

    Act 5: Business Simulator

    Dial your migration scenario

    Move the controls to simulate volume, workload intensity, model quality, and verification depth. This is a planning model, not a quote.

    Manual Budget

    $0

    0 weeks

    LLM-Assisted Budget

    $0

    0 weeks

    Operational Risk Delta

    0 fewer incidents/mo

    0%

    Estimated Business Lift

    $0

    ROI 0x

    Act 6: Caveats and Controls

    Where automation can fail, and how we contain it

    Semantic drift risk

    Equivalent syntax can still produce different results under null, collation, timezone, or transaction isolation differences.

    Performance inversion risk

    A query that runs in SQL Server can degrade in MySQL if join strategy, indexes, or grouping plans are not re-validated.

    Verification scope risk

    Unit checks are not enough for ETL and financial scripts. You need row-level invariants, reconciliation totals, and synthetic edge cases.

    Governance requirement

    Every conversion should ship with traceability: prompt lineage, diff artifacts, test evidence, and explicit manual-review decisions.